About a year ago I
defended Al Sharpton.. I cannot, however, defend
this nonsense.. Hystrionics for the sake of hystrionics. Camon. I'm all for you being outraged, or even faux-outraged for the cameras. You wanna protest then protest. Whatever. But when you start the overdramatics with "we're gonna shut this city down!!" you put me to sleep and lose me.
3 comments:
I'm not sure which is worse. That you defended a race-baiting thug like Sharpton last year (will you give equal time and mention how much you like David Duke's hair?) or that you spelled "histrionics" as "hystrionics." Or is that merely the spelling in Oxford? (just below a post on what an avid reader you used to be - Jaysus!)
Is this some new feminist thing, like "history" being "herstory"?
If so, be careful. You may be unintentionallye quating "hysterics" with "hysterectomy."
And yes, "unintentionallye quating" is how it is spelled at Oxford.
well pardon your misdirected hysterectomy
Post a Comment