One funny thing about the Brit Hume fiasco is the seeming consensus that if it could actually be proven that Christianity IS somehow a better source of redemption than Buddhism, it's okay for a "journalist" on a "fair and balanced" network to spew the shit he did; not the fact that he said the shit in the first place. People can't even seem to get their point of outrage right in this case.
(my new band name: "The Seeming Consensus")
No comments:
Post a Comment