JKBGHU*(^W*(^^*(T^*(DTU(W(*())(()(&^%^%$#@#@FBN NJI!I!!O!(!*(!**&^&!%!$!$

Yglesias echoes HERE what I wrote yesterday ABOUT THIS JERKOFF who doesn't seem to understand that if a business has no customers, it's not gonna be hiring new people just for the sake of hiring them, and many of his comments are saying exactly what I said a few months ago HERE:

I am not an economist, I am merely a man who happens to have the world's largest penis, so it's no wonder that I can't grasp how tax cuts would spur businesses to hire more people (particularly since such policy has been so dynamite over the past decade. cough.) despite the fact that there's still not people out there with wads of cash they're looking to spend at said businesses, unless it's to hire a bunch of people just for the sake of hiring them, but then you'd be asking businesses to participate in a sort of welfare system that certainly belies the American bald eagle.

If a business is not selling enough shit, it's not gonna hire extra people or expand, and the owner will simply pocket whatever he gets from the tax cut. If it IS selling enough shit to warrant extra help, they'll happily do so since that obviously means so many people are coming in and buying stuff. Aka "customers."

Funny. These people like corporate welfare, national defense welfare and now seem to be championing small business welfare. If only they were so gung-ho about welfare for poor people. Handouts for everyone!!....except for the unemployed who could be funneling money into these sacred "small businesses."