[T]he point of highlighting a candidate’s humble background isn’t just to suggest a “jes’ folks” common touch. It’s to emphasize how far they’ve come in life — all the way from that “house with a car up on blocks” to whatever distinguished office they hold now. In these kind of political narratives, growing up poor isn’t just being presented as evidence of character and accomplishment in and of itself. Rather, what’s being suggested is that growing up poor and then making something impressive of yourself is a more significant accomplishment than being born in relative comfort and doing well in life.This is, of course, a lie - Republicans don't want someone who ACTUALLY HAS a "humble background" (note their begging for Jeb Bush to run), they want someone who can PRETEND to have humble beginnings, eg. Bush growing up "in West Texas", as if he had no idea where the Oval Office was. Clinton and Obama actually embodying their "American Dream" scares the shit out of them; anything outside of the good ol' boy network scares the shit out of these people. Republicans are horrified to find out how "far" someone has come in life, and will do what they can to combat it.
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Republican nonsense
Ross Douthat via Sully:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
What is horrifying is the proposition that, when the American Dream is accomplished, it was not made possible solely by the hard work of the individual independent of government's intrusion, but rather was achieved only because of the nanny state. Instead of encouraging others to also pull themselves up by their bootstraps, Clinton and Obama seem content to promise everyone free boots paid for by Tony Lama Inc. and the rest of the nation's shit-kicker-wearing cowboys. YORF!
i just googled Tony Lama! :)
Post a Comment