The Atlantic writers debunk the myth of the lone genius,
using John and Paul as it's best example:
For centuries, the myth of the lone genius has towered over us, its
shadow obscuring the way creative work really gets done. The attempts to
pick apart the Lennon-McCartney partnership reveal just how misleading
that myth can be, because John and Paul were so obviously more creative
as a pair than as individuals, even if at times they appeared to work in
opposition to each other. The lone-genius myth prevents us from
grappling with a series of paradoxes about creative pairs: that distance
doesn’t impede intimacy, and is often a crucial ingredient of it; that
competition and collaboration are often entwined.
Of course years ago
Slate had a long series on the same thing:
Though he lived another six years, John Lennon never took the stage
for a major show again. His strange words have a peculiar and lasting
echo. By then, Paul and John had been the most famous exes in the world
for four years. But somehow, they were still "fiances"—prospective
spouses. As much as had passed, the energy between them was always in
front of them—always, somehow, in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment